e-VPN was a secure, user-friendly VPN service with a lot to offer, such as 256-bit AES encryption, Stealth Mode, and IPv6 support.
Unfortunately, in mid-2020, the VPN provider closed its doors, leaving many users unprotected.
If e-VPN caught your attention, there’s another VPN you’ll like: NordVPN.
NordVPN has many of the same features – military-grade encryption, obfuscation, an adblocker – and more, like a double VPN and Onion Over VPN.
But I’ll discuss all of that and more at the end of my e-VPN review.
For now, let’s discuss what e-VPN offered, how it performed, and what we’ll be missing
Was e-VPN Secure?
TL;DR: e-VPN had top-tier security features but could’ve been more secure by defaulting to 256-bit AES encryption instead of 128-bit.
e-VPN boasted military-grade 256-bit AES encryption, though its default was 128-bit AES. For this reason, while e-VPN was secure, it could’ve been more secure by defaulting to 256-bit instead.
Luckily, that’s not all e-VPN had under its belt.
The VPN provider also offered obfuscation via its Stealth Mode, enabling users to bypass firewalls, including the Great Firewall of China. Throw in the provider’s AdStop (adblocker) and private DNS servers (that prevented DNS leaks), and e-VPN’s security was pretty high-tier.
That’s not all, either.
e-VPN also provided a Kill Switch, Public WiFi Protection, and the OpenVPN protocol (TCP and UDP). On top of that, it was one of the few VPNs to support IPv6 – whether IPv6 addresses or IPv6 leak protection.
In regards to security, iProVPN uses military-grade 256-bit AES encryption alongside a selection of best-in-class protocols.
You can use the VPN on a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and Routers.
Was e-VPN Good for Privacy?
TL;DR: e-VPN probably didn’t store identifying logs. However, it did keep raw bandwidth usage. It was also never audited.
e-VPN probably didn’t store identifying logs. However, it did keep raw bandwidth usage. It was also never audited.
e-VPN was based in the UK, making it susceptible to the Five Eyes’ wrath.
The only questionable log was of “raw bandwidth usage of the servers WAN Interface (total data up/down per day) so that we can optimize our VPN service in order to deliver the best possible speeds to our customers.”
So, in layman’s terms, e-VPN stored raw bandwidth usage to optimize its servers based on server load.
Another thing e-VPN had in its favor for privacy was an old claim that the only person who maintained the service was the founder.
However, that claim is no longer available, as it was never archived on the WayBackMachine.
e-VPN Server Network
TL;DR: e-VPN had servers in 12 countries.
It’s unclear how many servers e-VPN had, though its archived website confirms it had servers in 12 countries. The VPN provider also claimed its servers supported:
TL;DR: e-VPN had decent speeds, thanks to its “Loadbalancer” and servers supporting up to 1Gbps, though it’s implied it had bandwidth limits.
e-VPN gave me decent speeds in past tests, though nowhere near as impressive as bigger providers.
For example, an old e-VPN speed test gave me a speed loss of 23.45 Mbps. For comparison, the best VPNs don’t give me a speed loss greater than 10 Mbps.
On top of that, it’s implied e-VPN limited bandwidth, though it was never specified what the limit was – just that an individual user would likely never reach the limit unless they shared their account.
Potential bandwidth limit aside, I’ve had worse speeds with other VPNs.
I suspect e-VPN’s “Loadbalancer” and up to 1Gbps speeds helped it overcome its small server network.
Was e-VPN Good for Torrenting?
e-VPN was mediocre for torrenting, as on top of its small server network and medium speeds, it only supported P2P on a handful of servers.
Some sources cite these servers as the US, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Russia, Ukraine, and France.
However, e-VPN’s archived website has no information on its past torrent limitations.
All in all, there are far better torrenting VPNs, like NordVPN, which allows torrenting on all of its servers and even has dedicated P2P servers.
Was e-VPN Good for Streaming?
During previous tests, e-VPN could unblock UK Netflix and BBC iPlayer on and off with minimal to no buffering.
However, it could not unblock Netflix US, Hulu, and other US streaming platforms.
Considering unblocking streaming services has become expected of the best VPN services, e-VPN could’ve done better in this department.
Do you want a VPN that unblocks all the major streaming platforms? Grab a discount on Surfshark here.
e-VPN Device Compatibility
e-VPN had apps for all major platforms – Windows, iOS, Android, and macOS – and was compatible with Linux and Amazon Firestick. Its website also offered OpenVPN configuration guides for other devices.
It’s nice to see e-VPN supported the most popular devices, but that’s no longer enough. The best VPNs support major platforms, browsers, smart TVs, game consoles, routers, and more.
Although, e-VPN’s simultaneous connections limit was 15 devices – far more than the industry standard of 5-7.
Do you want a VPN that supports many devices and unlimited simultaneous connections? Grab a discount on Surfshark here.
e-VPN Customer Support
Before its shutdown, e-VPN opted for a ticket system instead of live chat support.
This would’ve become a problem, as ticket systems aren’t as reliable as talking to a live agent. But, on the Brightside, the VPN provider’s “Knowledgebase” was also very extensive, with plenty of setup guides and FAQs.
e-VPN Subscription Fees
One thing e-VPN had going for itself was its crazy-affordable subscription fees. At its closing, the VPN provider had three subscription plans: 1-Year, 2-Years, and 3-Years.
Here’s the breakdown:
- 1-Year Plan – £10 (£0.80/month)
- 2-Year Plan – £20 (£0.80/month)
- 3-Year Plan – £30 (£0.80/month)
So, while there were no savings on long-term plans, the overall prices were very affordable. And considering all the features e-VPN included for that price, it was probably the VPN’s most attractive part.
e-VPN Alternatives: 4 Fast, Affordable, & Secure VPNs
Rest easy – e-VPN might be shut down, but there are still plenty of fast, affordable, and secure VPNs out there!
To help narrow down the list, here are my top four e-VPN alternatives:
NordVPN has 5,100+ servers in 68 countries and comes jam-packed with premium security features – much like e-VPN did!
This includes obfuscation, a double VPN, two kill switches, Onion Over VPN feature, the most secure protocols, and 256-bit AES encryption.
Plus, it has dedicated P2P servers and unblocks all major streaming platforms.
ExpressVPN is one of the fastest VPNs I’ve tested, making it a far better option for speed-intensive tasks (like gaming and streaming) than e-VPN was.
You’ll also get automatic obfuscation on every server, a kill switch, 3,000+ RAM-only servers, and Smart DNS for streaming your favorite shows on Smart TVs and game consoles.
ExpressVPN is also P2P-friendly.
Surfshark is one of the few VPNs that offer unlimited simultaneous connections, beating e-VPN’s past offering of 15.
This means you can multitask on all your devices while your friends or family use Surfshark on their devices at the same time.
Additionally, Surfshark has a double VPN, kill switch, and two obfuscation features. It’s also P2P-friendly and unblocks all major streaming platforms.
Private Internet Access
Private Internet Access has the biggest server network I’ve seen at 31,000+ servers (the last known number).
It also supports port forwarding and the SOCKS5 proxy, giving you ultra-fast torrent speeds, and has a double VPN, kill switch, and split tunneling. Of course, it also unblocks all major streaming platforms.
e-VPN was a good VPN, especially for security-conscious users on a budget. But that doesn’t mean you’re out of luck since the provider closed its doors.
Instead, I recommend trying NordVPN – you’ll get everything e-VPN offered and more.
Alternatively, check our Best VPNs for Your Case page for more recommendations.