- More security features
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 3,200+ servers in 100 locations
- Simple app interface
- Overall faster speeds than Surfshark
- Unblocks streaming services, including Netflix US & UK
- 3,000+ servers in 94 countries
- Premium security suite
Surfshark and ExpressVPN are reliable VPNs with similar features, including server count, obfuscation, and SmartDNS.
But how different are they when it comes down to the wire?
This guide answers everything!
I’ll compare Surfshark and ExpressVPN regarding server locations, their presence (or lack thereof) in China, streaming capabilities, torrenting, user privacy, security, and value.
If you’re undecided on which VPN to lean towards, I’ll help you decide.
Read this to the end to find out more about ExpressVPN vs. Surfshark.
Surfshark vs. ExpressVPN (Overview Table)
| Surfshark | ExpressVPN | |
|---|---|---|
| Servers: | 3,200+ servers | 3,000+ servers |
| Speed: | 6.5 Mbps drop | 0 Mbps drop |
| Protocols: | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 | Lightway, OpenVPN, IKEv2 |
| Streaming: | Hulu, Amazon Prime, NRK, France.TV, BBC iPlayer | Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, NRK, France.TV, BBC iPlayer |
| Torrenting: | On all servers, but no seeding | On all servers but seeding on compatible routers only |
| Gaming: | 23.50 ms ping + 10.7 % packet loss | 30.38 ms ping + 0.7 % packet loss |
| Logs: | Verified no-logs policy | Verified no-logs policy |
| Security: | Multihop, Obfuscation, Wi-Fi protection, IP Leak protection, AES 256-bit Encryption. | Automatic Obfuscation, Wi-Fi Protection, IP Leak protection, AES 256-bit Encryption |
| Devices: | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Edge, Chrome, FireTV | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Kindle Fire, Amazon Fire TV, Chromebook |
| Simultaneous Connections: | Unlimited | 5 |
| Customer Support: | 24/7 live chat | 24/7 live chat |
| Best Deal: | Surfshark | ExpressVPN |
Server Locations
Surfshark has 3200+ servers in 100+ countries, while ExpressVPN offers 3,000+ servers in 94 countries. These VPN providers are almost on equal footing as far as server distribution is concerned. However, things are a little different when you dig deeper.
For example, Surfshark has a superior US server network with over 600 servers compared to ExpressVPN, which only has 25. So you’ll have an easier time unblocking US-only content like Sling TV or Peacock TV with Surfshark.
The chances of ending up in a crowded US server on Surfshark are also significantly lower than ExpressVPN.
Moreover, Surfshark also offers 6 African servers in Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Morocco, Nigeria, and South Africa, while ExpressVPN has 4 in Algeria, Egypt, Kenya, and South Africa.
Both VPNs also run on RAM-only servers. ExpressVPN achieves this through the use of its proprietary TrustedServer Technology. This gives ExpressVPN the edge over Surfshark because TrustedServer Technology is proprietary and has been audited.
China
Neither Surfshark nor ExpressVPN has servers in mainland China.
The closest locations to China from both VPNs are Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau.
The good news is that both VPNs have robust obfuscation, allowing you to bypass the heavy censorship and access foreign content within China.
I’ll expand more on obfuscation in another section.
Surfshark and ExpressVPN have nearly the same number of servers, with Surfshark pulling slightly ahead. Both don’t have servers in China but offer vital obfuscation.
However, with 600+ US servers and 6 African servers, Surfshark wins the round.
Is Surfshark Faster Than ExpressVPN?
ExpressVPN is faster than Surfshark VPN. Based on the 18 tests I performed across three protocols and servers for each VPN, I wouldn’t even consider this a contest.
I used the following servers and protocols on my Macbook to ensure standardized results:
- Lightway UDP (ExpressVPN) vs. WireGuard (Surfshark)
- IKEv2 for both VPNs
- OpenVPN UDP for both VPNS
As for the servers, I chose one closest to me, one in the middle, and the furthest.
This included:
- South Africa (Closest)
- United States
- Australia (Furthest)
Here’s a screenshot of the fastest Surfshark test.
And here’s the fastest ExpressVPN server.
Overall, the results were within my expectations. For instance, the best-performing servers for both VPNs were in South Africa, while Australia and the United States registered the slowest speeds. This proves that servers closest to your location are likely the fastest.
The stellar performance from ExpressVPN’s Lightway Protocol wasn’t surprising, either. However, Surshark’s WireGuard results were slightly below what I projected based on my past interactions.
Furthermore, the difference in the average speeds between ExpressVPN and Surfshark was 11.27 Mbps. That’s wider than the partition that Moses pulled on the Red Sea.
There wasn’t any point across the 18 tests where Surfshark was faster than ExpressVPN.
Speed & Performance Tests
Here’s a more detailed breakdown of how the tests panned out.
| US Server | South Africa Server | Australia Server | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surfshark (WireGuard) | 8.25 Mbps drop | 6.5 Mbps drop | 9.09 Mbps drop |
| ExpressVPN (Lightway UDP) | 1.81 Mbps drop | 0 Mbps drop | 8.56 Mbps drop |
| Surfshark (IKEv2) | 26.76 Mbps drop | 14.12 Mbps drop | 13.98 Mbps drop |
| ExpressVPN (IKEv2) | 5.78 Mbps drop | 0 Mbps drop | 4.72 Mbps drop |
| Surfshark (OpenVPN UDP) | 22.7 Mbps drop | 13.79 Mbps drop | 21.2 Mbps drop |
| ExpressVPN (OpenVPN UDP) | 10.51 Mbps drop | 0.91 Mbps drop | 3.05 Mbps drop |
| Average Surfshark Speeds | 14.87 Mbps | ||
| Average ExpressVPN Speeds | 26.14 Mbps | ||
ExpressVPN was superior to Surfshark, no matter the protocol or the distance of the server from my physical location. It was incredibly faster when combining the Lightway Protocol with a South African server. So ExpressVPN wins this round.
Streaming
Surfshark and ExpressVPN unblocked five geo-restricted streaming services from 5 regions without issues. I ran tests on Hulu, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, NRK, and France.TV.
Here’s the breakdown of the tests:
| Streaming Service | Surfshark | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Hulu | Yes | Yes |
| BBC iPlayer | Yes | Yes |
| Disney+ | No | Yes |
| NRK | Yes | Yes |
| France.TV | Yes | Yes |
Regarding NRK, both VPNs have Norway servers that allowed me to access content exclusive to the Scandinavian nation. Thanks to their quick search function, finding the server wasn’t hard on either VPN.
The same was true for France.TV. Furthermore, I didn’t have to hop from one server to another; all streaming platforms were unblocked on the first attempt.
Streaming 4K content was smooth on ExpressVPN (Lightway UDP), and I didn’t experience any buffering across the tests I ran on my macOS, Windows, and Android devices. But there was some buffering with Surfshark (WireGuard).
Both VPNs also offer SmartDNS for smart TVs that don’t support native VPN apps.
I will dive into this in a later section.
Netflix Tests
With Netflix having a bigger global coverage, I wanted to see if Surfshark and ExpressVPN can unblock specific geo-locked Netflix libraries.
I tested Netflix US, Netflix UK, Netflix Japan, Netflix Netherlands, and Netflix France, and both VPNs unblocked all of these libraries.
This gave me access to fantastic entertainment options I’ve never seen in the Netflix version of my country.
| Unblocks: | Netflix US? | Netflix UK? | Other Netflix Libraries? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surfshark | Yes | Yes | Netflix NL, JP, FR |
| ExpressVPN | Yes | Yes | Netflix NL, JP, FR |
For the test, I successfully unblocked Team America: World Police using a US VPN server.
I achieved the same for the UK (The Blair Witch Project), Japan (The Promised Neverland), France (Merci Pour Le Chocolat), and the Netherlands (Gomorrah).
This was a tie. Surfshark and ExpressVPN unblocked all the streaming sites I tested, including fringe platforms like NRK and exclusive Netflix libraries from the US, Japan, France, the UK, and the Netherlands, without any buffering.
Torrenting
Surfshark and ExpressVPN offer P2P support, but Surfshark is the only one with dedicated P2P servers. These P2P servers are easy to find and optimized for speeds. But that doesn’t mean ExpressVPN slacks – it packs amazing download speeds with its regular servers.
Furthermore, ExpressVPN is the only VPN that allows port forwarding on routers. Therefore, ExpressVPN is the better option to seed your torrents – especially useful if you want to join private torrenting sites. Surfshark doesn’t offer port forwarding due to security reasons.
Additionally, Surfshark explicitly states in its Terms of Service that the use of its services is governed by and subject to all the laws that protect copyright ownership and intellectual property. Here’s Surfshark’s statement:
Meanwhile, ExpressVPN also forbids the use of its services in uploading, downloading, posting, reproducing, or distributing any copyright-protected content. Here’s the screenshot of their policy:
P2P Tests
To confirm the ability of these two VPNs to handle torrenting, I downloaded a copyright-free 460 MB file to see how fast both were using the Free Download Manager torrenting client. To get the best results, these are the parameters I used:
- The WireGuard protocol plus a South African server for Surfshark.
- The Lightway UDP protocol plus a South African server for ExpressVPN.
Here are my results:
| Average Download Speed | Max Download Speed | Download Completion Time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surfshark | 295 KB/s | 358 KB/s | 21 minutes, 21 seconds |
| ExpressVPN | 416 KB/s | 763 KB/s | 10 minutes, 02 seconds |
ExpressVPN was faster than Surfshark, completing the same download in half the time.
Surfshark and ExpressVPN have P2P support. Surfshark may have servers dedicated to P2P, but ExpressVPN is faster at torrenting files and allows port forwarding via routers.
So ExpressVPN wins this round.
Gaming
ExpressVPN is better at gaming than Surfshark. To start, I ran ping and packet loss tests:
| Server | Protocol | Ping | Packet Loss | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surfshark | South Africa | WireGuard | 23.50 ms | 10.7% |
| ExpressVPN | South Africa | Lightway UDP | 30.38 ms | 0.7 % |
I picked one macOS-compatible light game, Asphalt 9: Legends, for this test, then repeated the test with a heavier game, Fortnite.
ExpressVPN had the most negligible packet loss in the test, with just 0.7%.
With this, I barely noticed any lag when playing both games.
In comparison, Surfshark had a packet data loss of 10.7%, which was noticeable, especially when playing Fortnite. I experienced freezing and lags that gave my opponents a considerable advantage.
Here’s the test result for Surfshark:
And here’s what I got with ExpressVPN:
ExpressVPN was better at gaming than Surfshark. It had the least packet loss of 0.7% compared to the 10.7% registered by Surfshark. I didn’t experience much lag or freezes with ExpressVPN, giving it the win.
Privacy
Surfshark and ExpressVPN adhere to a strict no-logs policy.
I looked at the privacy policies of both VPNs on their website, and there were interesting bits worth your attention.
For example, both VPNs store email addresses and payment info to ensure the services work as intended. The email address is the official communication channel, while payment details can be used to process refunds. Other than that, no user data is saved.
However, ExpressVPN’s stored payment data depends on the user’s payment option. For example, they may share user data with third-party payment processors like PayPal, BitPay, or Stripe.
If you’re uncomfortable sharing this information, both VPNs offer cryptocurrency payment options that minimize the amount of personal data you share.
More on payment options in the price and value section.
Moving on, ExpressVPN is based in the British Virgin Islands, which isn’t part of any surveillance alliances. Comparatively, Surfshark is based in the Netherlands, part of the 9 Eyes.
The downside is that there’s very little Surfshark can do if any government bodies in the Nine-Eyes Alliance demand logs. However, Surfshark has a verified and audited no-logs policy, so they would have nothing to give.
Furthermore, Surfshark’s Warrant Canary, that’s publicly available, also reinforces its commitment to full transparency. So you’re in safe hands.
(Unfortunately, ExpressVPN doesn’t have a Warrant Canary.)
Let’s further break down the logging policies in the next section.
Logging Policies
Here’s a quick breakdown of Surfshark and ExpressVPN’s logging policies:
| Traffic Logs? | Connection Logs? | IP Address? | Server Location? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surfshark | No | No | No | No |
| ExpressVPN | No | No | No | No |
Additionally, Surfshark and ExpressVPN have undergone audits.
The most recent ExpressVPN audits were done by KPMG and Cure53 on its TrustedServer technology and the no-logs policy in 2022.
ExpressVPN has passed all the audits so far, with nothing out of place detected.
Surfshark has also had its fair share of rigorous audits, with the most notable one conducted by Deloitte in January 2023 to check if Surshark complies with its no-logs policy. Surfshark passed the audit.
Finally, ExpressVPN’s Lightway Protocol is open-source; anyone can see everything that went into Lightway’s core code and even adopt it.
ExpressVPN also published the source code for its browser extensions in 2019.
I didn’t see anything to indicate that Surfshark is open-source.
Surfshark and ExpressVPN are strict regarding logging policies and have undergone extensive audits. However, ExpressVPN has had more detailed audits and open-sourced projects. Therefore, ExpressVPN takes this round.
Security
Surfshark and ExpressVPN excel in the security department.
Both VPNs offer AES 256-bit encryption across all their apps, protocols, and servers.
I ran each VPN through the Wireshark app using South African servers, and the results confirmed that encryption is alive and kicking.
Furthermore, Surfshark and ExpressVPN offer kill switches for IP leak protection. Surfshark has two kill switches on the Android platform.
ExpressVPN maintains a single kill switch for each platform, giving Surfshark the lead.
Below are the results of the WebRTC, IP, and DNS leak tests I conducted for the two VPNs.
WebRTC Leak Test
As you can see from the screenshots below, the IP addresses shown correspond to the virtual IPs provided by the VPN. That’s proof that there were no leaks in the VPN connection.
IP and DNS Leak Test
ExpressVPN and Surfshark have their own IP and DNS leak tests, and I took advantage of them to see if their claims were valid. Here are the results.
DDoS Protection
Surfshark and ExpressVPN also offer DDoS protection. Other gamers won’t be able to bombard your system with requests that slow down your speeds because they only see the virtual IP addresses you connect through.
You can also switch to a new server when you notice suspicious activity.
This offering is equal across both VPNs.
Public Wi-Fi Protection
Through military-grade encryption, Surfshark and ExpressVPN protect your system against Man-in-the-Middle attacks and Wi-Fi sniffing when you switch to public hotspots.
I grabbed my Macbook and checked into my favorite Starbucks to test both VPNs using the cafe’s Wi-Fi. Both VPNs passed the test again!
Obfuscation
Surfshark has an obfuscation feature called Camouflage Mode that’s automatically activated when you switch to the OpenVPN protocol.
Meanwhile, ExpressVPN has automatic obfuscation that works across all protocols and servers. ExpressVPN’s automatic obfuscation is one of the fastest around, unlike Surfshark, where you’re limited to using slow protocols.
Malware Protection
Surfshark has a CleanWeb feature that doubles as an ad and malware blocker.
The feature is available across all platforms and is activated from the settings.
Meanwhile, ExpressVPN has a Threat Manager feature that deals with malware and stops trackers from sharing your information with third-party advertisers.
Like CleanWeb, you must activate this feature in settings to use it.
However, Threat Manager doesn’t block ads, making CleanWeb the better option.
Extra Security Features
There are unique security features in each of these VPNs not found in the other.
Surfshark has an in-built antivirus that scans your device for viruses and gives you real-time protection, perfect for people who love visiting risky sites like Pirate Bay.
You can either conduct a full or a quick scan.
Furthermore, Surfshark is the only one that offers Dedicated IP addresses.
It works with all connection protocols and protects your devices through the same virtual IP address. However, it comes at an extra cost. I’ll cover that in a bit.
There’s also the NoBorders feature that automatically activates when Surfshark detects network restrictions in some regions.
Finally, Surfshark offers 12 MultiHop servers, which route your VPN connection through two servers for double the security. This feature is missing in ExpressVPN.
You get military-grade encryption, IP and DNS leak protection on both VPNs, DDoS protection, public WIFI protection, obfuscation, and malware protection.
However, Surfshark goes further by providing an ad blocker, MultiHop, and antivirus.
So Surfshark wins this round.
Devices & Connections
Surfshark and ExpressVPN are compatible with various devices like smartphones, tablets, routers, smart TVs, etc.
You can run Surfshark directly on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, FireTV, Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Xbox, PlayStation, and select router brands.
Meanwhile, ExpressVPN works on macOS, Windows, Linux, smart TVs, iOS, media consoles, Android, Chromebook, Amazon Fire, and many routers.
Surfshark has a slight edge over ExpressVPN, as it works on more Smart TVs.
Moving on, you can connect an unlimited number of devices simultaneously on Surfshark. ExpressVPN only allows five simultaneous connections, making Surfshark the better option for large households.
Below is the complete breakdown of device support:
| Surfshark | ExpressVPN | |
|---|---|---|
| Compatible OS? | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, FireTV, gaming consoles, etc. | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Kindle Fire, Amazon Fire TV, Chromebook, gaming consoles, etc. |
| Smart TVs? | Android TV, Apple TV, Roku, Google TV, Chromecast, LG TV, Nvidia Shield, FireTV, SmartDNS. | Android TV, FireTV, Apple TV, Roku, Google Chromecast, NVIDIA Shield, Mi Box, SmartDNS. |
| Router Support? | Yes (manual + app) | Yes (manual + app) |
| Browser Extensions? | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
SmartDNS
Additionally, ExpressVPN and Surfshark have SmartDNS that allows you to stream content using your VPN on devices that don’t support VPN apps.
You can use the SmartDNS on smart TVs and game consoles.
However, for Surfshark, you can only stream US content, though the setup is more straightforward than ExpressVPN.
Specifically, an “Activate Smart DNS” button triggers the Surfshark website to automatically detect your IP address and generate a SmartDNS address for you.
This contrasts ExpressVPN’s SmartDNS, which requires you to manually register your IP address first.
For ExpressVPN, the SmartDNS feature is called MediaStreamer, and it works on Samsung and LG smart TVs. Additionally, unlike Surfshark, MediaStreamer works for UK content too.
Both VPNs have high device compatibility and even provide Smart DNS for smart TVs that don’t work with VPN apps. But Surfshark holds an advantage over ExpressVPN by providing more smart TV support, an easier SmartDNS setup, and unlimited simultaneous connections. So Surfshark wins this round.
Split Tunneling
Surfshark and ExpressVPN provide a split tunneling feature, but the availability varies from one platform to another.
Surfshark’s split tunneling feature is Bypasser and available only on Windows and Android, while for ExpressVPN, the split tunneling feature is available for Windows, iOS, Android, and macOS 11 and below.
On Android and Windows, you can use the Bypasser in two ways.
You can use the Bypass VPN option, where the apps you choose use the internet without the VPN. Alternatively, you can use the Route via VPN, where only the apps you choose go through the VPN.
On ExpressVPN, there are three options:
- Force all mobile apps to use the VPN.
- Exclude some apps from using the VPN.
- Only allow a few apps to use the VPN.
ExpressVPN’s split tunneling feature is available on more devices than Surfshark, giving it the edge.
Both VPNs are equipped with split tunneling, and the feature isn’t available on some apps for both VPNs. Using this feature is also straightforward on both VPNs, with easy-to-follow actionable buttons. But since ExpressVPN offers the feature across all its devices, bar macOS versions above 11, it wins this round.
Customer Support
ExpressVPN and Surfshark provide Live Chat, direct email, FAQs, and support guides.
Responses through the Live Chat options were instant on both VPNs, and all my queries were answered promptly and accurately.
I was also happy to find that both VPNs allow people to email themselves the entire transcript of the Live Chat, which is helpful if you want to preserve the valuable tips from customer support.
But Surfshark slightly edges ExpressVPN in this section, as it has a more detailed help section that tackles every common problem users may encounter.
Both VPNs have amazing blogs that address and troubleshoot general issues that users may encounter when using the services.
Overall, both VPNs take customer support very seriously and are always on hand to answer any question you may throw at them at any given time.
But Surfshark’s help guide section is more extensive than ExpressVPN, so it wins this round.
Usability
I used macOS, Windows, and Android for this comparison review.
Surfshark and ExpressVPN have put much effort into making their apps user-friendly and easy to navigate. However, there are some differences across compatible platforms.
Take split tunneling, for instance; it’s missing on the macOS versions of Surfshark and ExpressVPN but very efficient on Android and Windows for both.
ExpressVPN’s settings on Windows have extra options, like starting ExpressVPN as a minimized window when you launch your computer.
But the same Windows app lacks the Threat Manager option, which is also unavailable on Android.
ExpressVPN for Android also has an extra button for privacy and security tools that allows you to run DNS and WebRTC leaks from within the app.
Surfshark for Android and Windows comes with extra features like Invisible LAN, with the Android version going an extra step with a feature called Override GPS Location on top of two kill switches.
Furthermore, this VPN provider for macOS has only two protocols, IKEv2 and WireGuard, while the Android and Windows versions have both, plus OpenVPN. Surfshark for Windows is the only app with an inbuilt speed test feature.
Overall, these slight differences don’t impact how the different apps perform.
However, the lack of OpenVPN protocol on Surfshark for macOS is bound to affect how you use the service since you can’t use obfuscation.
There are significant differences as far as functional buttons are concerned with both VPNs. But the lack of OpenVPN protocol on Surfshark for macOS is too big to ignore, so ExpressVPN wins this round.
Price & Value
Surfshark is significantly cheaper than ExpressVPN. Surfshark offers three price plans, all bundled with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
I recommend the 24-month subscription, which has the biggest discount.
However, you must pay extra for the Dedicated IP Address add-on.
Meanwhile, ExpressVPN comes with three price plans with shorter durations than Surfshark.
For example, the best value option runs for 12 months. All price plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
When it comes to payment options, Surfshark and ExpressVPN are stacked with a rich array of alternatives.
ExpressVPN offers card payments with VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover, and JCB support. Surfshark, on the other hand, has VISA, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover.
Both VPNs have PayPal and cryptocurrency, but Surfshark has more in the form of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP, while ExpressVPN only offers Bitcoin.
Surfshark has Google Pay and Amazon Pay options, while ExpressVPN counters that with 12 Paymentwall options like Union Pay, Sofort, and GiroPay.
The bottom line is that both VPNs have paid special attention to the needs of their clients from as many regions as possible. Combining card payments and cryptocurrency is a nice touch. But ExpressVPN takes the crown for having more payment options than Surfshark.
Surfshark vs. ExpressVPN (Overview Table)
| Surfshark | ExpressVPN | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Servers: | 3,200+ VPN servers | 3,000+ VPN servers | Surfshark |
| Speed: | 6.5 Mbps drop | 0 Mbps drop | ExpressVPN |
| Protocols: | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 | Lightway, OpenVPN, IKEv2 | Tie |
| Streaming: | Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, NRK, France.TV, BBC iPlayer, etc | Netflix, Hulu, Disney+, NRK, France.TV, BBC iPlayer, etc | Tie |
| Torrenting: | On all servers, but no seeding | On all servers with seeding on compatible routers only | ExpressVPN |
| Gaming: | 23.50 ms ping + 10.7 % packet loss | 30.38 ms ping + 0.7 % packet loss | ExpressVPN |
| Logs: | Verified no-logs policy | Verified no-logs policy | ExpressVPN |
| Security: | Multihop, Obfuscation, Wi-Fi protection, IP Leak protection, AES 256-bit Encryption. | Automatic Obfuscation, Wi-Fi Protection, IP Leak protection, AES 256-bit Encryption | Surfshark |
| Devices: | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Edge, Chrome, FireTV | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, Smart TVs, routers, Kindle Fire, Amazon Fire TV, Chromebook | Surfshark |
| Simultaneous Connections: | Unlimited | 5 | Surfshark |
| Customer Support: | 24/7 live chat | 24/7 live chat | Surfshark |
| Best Deal: | Surfshark | ExpressVPN |
The Home Run: Who Takes It?
It may look like a tough choice, but making the final decision is easier with all the cards on the table.
Do you want a fast VPN that provides buffer-free streaming, smooth gaming, and quick downloads? ExpressVPN is your medicine.
But if you’re on a tight budget and need a VPN that gives you decent speeds, unlimited device coverage, and reliable security and privacy features, then Surfshark will provide you with what you need.
Ultimately, the ball is in your court. Grab your Surfshark or ExpressVPN subscriptions and enjoy our exclusive deals before that offer runs out.
Protect private web traffic from snooping, interference, and censorship. All plans are covered by a no-hassle 100% money-back guarantee for your first 30 days of service.
