Surfshark vs. Private Internet Access: Which VPN Wins? (2026)

Which should you buy? Surfshark if speed and security extras matter: it won our speed, streaming and security rounds. Private Internet Access if price comes first: its 2-year deal is $2.03 a month ($56.84 for 28 months) and renews at the same price, against Surfshark’s $2.49 ($67.23 for 27 months) and $79 a year after that. Both cover unlimited devices.

US prices before sales tax, re-checked in November 2026 during the Black Friday sales.

Surfshark and Private Internet Access are top-tier VPNs competing for center stage. But which one outshines?

Launched in 2010, PIA has had more time to mature than Surfshark, born recently in 2018. However, the latter proves more evolved in some departments, speed and reliable unblocking included.

Similarities like RAM-only servers and affordable subscriptions also defy age, leaving the VPNs to butt heads in multiple categories.

Continue reading to determine which one gets your greater applause.

Buying now? Surfshark’s Black Friday deal is live: see our Surfshark Black Friday guide for the current price, Surfshark One for $2.49 a month with 3 extra months.

Surfshark vs. Private VPN (Overview Table)

Winner GET DISCOUNT NOW

Server Locations

Surfshark openly boasts 4,500+ servers spanning 100 countries and 150+ locations.

But PIA needs to be more specific, and a chat with customer support yielded no confirmation of an actual server count.

My PIA agent responded, “As we keep acquiring new servers and retiring old ones, we do not have the number of current active servers currently running for our system.”

PIA VPN service now confirms servers in 113 countries, including all 50 US states, across 180 locations (the agent I spoke to had estimated 157).

While both VPNs lean toward large server fleets, both rely on virtual locations too: 46 of Surfshark’s 100 countries are virtual, and so are 62 of PIA’s 113, hinting that lag might be an issue on either. 

That leaves Surfshark with physical servers in 54 countries and PIA in 51.

Moving on, both VPNs run on audited server infrastructures and RAM-only technology, ensuring VPN activity is wiped clean whenever a server’s turned off. 

The catch is that all PIA’s RAM-only servers are co-located, meaning there can be unwarranted downtime and opportunities for sharing information with third parties.

Does Surfshark or PIA Work in China?

Both VPNs work in China to a degree.

PIA has a virtual China location (a Chinese IP address on a server in Singapore, according to PIA’s own list), allowing users to unblock some restricted content, like Chinese streaming sites, from outside China. You can also use PIA to bypass the Great Firewall. But! PIA admits this functionality is unstable:

Surfshark doesn’t have a server in China, although it has servers nearby – Hong Kong and Taiwan. It also has a virtual server in a Chinese administration region, Macau.

Alternatively, you can configure a manual connection to China using both VPNs’ OpenVPN setups.

Is Surfshark Faster Than PIA?

I ran speed tests on each VPN’s Windows protocols using three physical server locations, and Surfshark remains superiorly faster than PIA!

This is a surprise since both VPNs use the same protocols: OpenVPN, WireGuard, and IKEv2.

Surfshark protocols:

PIA protocols:

Speeds were compared to my average download speed at the time, 51.28 Mbps.

Rounding up my results, the Surfshark VPN averaged a 20.33% speed drop, and PIA averaged a 26.39% speed drop.

Let’s take a closer look at speed performance.

Speed & Performance

The table below shows the speed drops for each VPN across the different protocols and servers in the US, UK, and South Africa:

South Africa is where I tested from, so it makes sense that the speed drop’s minimal there. However, a significant gap was noted between Surfshark and PIA on WireGuard and OpenVPN (UDP), with the former making no real impact on my connection.

PIA’s download speed drop wasn’t felt when using WireGuard, but OpenVPN protocols battled to keep up with my local speed demand.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark is faster than PIA, even though they use the same protocols.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Streaming

Another category where Surfshark takes most of the limelight is streaming.

I tested the unblocking performance of both VPNs on multiple streaming platforms, including Hulu, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, NRK, and France.TV. 

This table summarizes my results:

Surfshark’s US Seattle server granted me immediate access to Hulu. 

The same goes for the four other US servers and streaming sites I tested; I had no unblocking issues.

As for PIA, I tried five servers, including PIA’s US streaming server, but none allowed me to bypass Hulu geo-restrictions. I even tried Incognito Mode and my mobile network connection – nothing.

I had the same experiences with the other streaming sites I tested, barring BBC iPlayer, which was a smooth unblock using PIA’s UK London streaming server.

I also tried PIA’s SmartDNS feature to binge the US Netflix’s Borgia on my SmartTV, which isn’t compatible with VPN app installations. 

Without any hiccups, the setup fulfilled its purpose at the time, but PIA now says, “Our Smart DNS feature is no longer compatible with streaming services.”

I continued to explore Netflix with Surfshark and PIA. See my findings below.

Netflix Tests

I tested Surfshark and PIA over six Netflix libraries: the US, UK, Germany, Australia, France, and Japan. This table draws a pretty picture:

It was connect-and-play with both providers. Only PIA’s optimized streaming servers worked, as the streaming connections failed on the standard PIA regional servers.

Surfshark was smooth sailing, and its fast speeds allowed 4K streaming on UK Netflix, where Downton Abbey was the name of the game (I’m a sucker for period dramas).

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark is more consistent than PIA, allowing me to unblock and stream without troubleshooting.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Torrenting

While both VPNs can be used for torrenting, PIA offers port forwarding for torrent seeding (on most of its locations, though not on its US servers), giving it the advantage. I ran a quick seeding test to back this claim.

I also reached out to PIA to ask about P2P support. The response was disappointing:

But Surfshark raises spirits. It offers P2P support on most of its 4,500+ servers (its server page showed 13 of its 100 countries without P2P in October 2026) and P2P optimization on a select few. You can view Surfshark’s P2P-optimized servers by searching for “P2P” in the search bar.

If you simply want to download files, you’ll be interested in my P2P tests below.

P2P Tests

I compared the torrent download speeds on Surfshark and PIA servers with a 7.01 MiB copyright-free version of The House of the Rising Sun.

I used uTorrent, but both VPNs are compatible with qBitTorrent, and Deluge.

Likewise, to be fair, I disconnected port forwarding on PIA and connected both VPNs to a P2P server in South Africa for comparable results. 

The WireGuard protocol was another constant.

Surfshark was 23 seconds faster, although PIA followed closely!

PIA’s close follow-up:

Gaming

I ran a ping and packet loss test using the faster WireGuard protocol to see if Surfshark and PIA suit gaming.

This table summarizes my results:

The ping discrepancy between the two VPNs was so large that I ran each test twice to ensure connection disturbances didn’t affect the results.

But the figures remained the same, and PIA’s ping rate is a force to be reckoned with!

I performed real-life gameplay tests on Among Us and GTA 5 across both VPNs.

Despite latency differences, Surfshark’s lag was noticeable but minimal – not enough to frustrate me.

PIA, on the other hand, was smooth sailing.

EXPERT SUMMARY

PIA’s ping was significantly lower than Surfshark’s, prompting smoother gameplay.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Privacy

Surfshark is based in the Netherlands, and PIA has its headquarters in Colorado, the US.  

The Netherlands has no obligatory data retention laws, but it does form part of the 9/14 eye alliance. On the other hand, the US is riddled with grey areas where privacy’s concerned – and it’s also a member of the 5/9/14 alliance.

The alliances mean that either provider may be obligated to share information with allied countries.

The good news is that both VPNs retain minimal data; all you need for a subscription is an email address. PIA even auto-generates a username, so you don’t have to continue logging in with your email, although it’s still an option.

Another surety is both VPN providers accept cryptocurrency if you don’t want to share your credit card or PayPal details, further securing your anonymity.

Additionally, both VPNs have competing ad-blockers to block ads, trackers, and malicious websites, leaving no room for privacy leaks. Surfshark’s ad-blocker is called CleanWeb, and PIA has MACE; each can be activated via the VPN apps at no extra cost.

I tested the efficiency of these ad blockers using the Adblock-Tester.

Surfshark:

PIA:

Surfshark rounds off with the advantage of Rotating IPs, a feature activated via app settings. This privacy addition rotates your IPs while keeping your VPN location the same.

However, it’s the providers logging policies that sharpen the service.

Logging Policies

I studied the privacy and logging policies of Surfshark and PIA and discovered the following:

The VPNs do store basic information such as:

• VPN server IP addresses you connect to
• Your username/email address
• Payment information
• Connection time stamps when you connect to a particular VPN server

Peace of mind is granted knowing that the VPNs’ RAM-only servers automatically encrypt and delete activity (not subscription information) within a few seconds of ending your session.

And there are no-logging policies. Both VPNs have had their no-logs policies audited by Deloitte, one of the world’s most prestigious auditing firms: PIA’s in 2022, 2024 and 2025, and Surfshark’s in 2023 and 2025.

Surfshark goes a step ahead and shares its entire Deloitte report. 

I appreciate this level of transparency! When I first asked PIA’s agents if I could view their report from Deloitte, they said “no,” – which contradicted the following statement on their website (PIA now says the full report of its 2025 audit is available for download):

To give PIA the benefit of the doubt, it does announce the following:

It’s also one of few VPNs to prove their no-logs claim in court. 

PIA’s been subpoenaed numerous times for logs, and they had no data to share each time.

Last, PIA offers 100% open-source VPN apps, unlike Surfshark, allowing anyone to view and analyze their code.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark’s solid data retention laws, transparent Deloitte report, fewer alliances, and clean subpoena record provide more surety than PIA.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Security

Surfshark and PIA use AES 256-bit encryption and offer IP/DNS leak prevention, a kill switch, and DDoS protection. On kill switches, PIA offers an advanced setup where you can activate leak protection by blocking traffic going outside the VPN even when it’s turned off.

I tested the encryption on both providers using the WireGuard protocol and I’m happy with the results, as confirmed by Wireshark:

I also wanted to ensure leak prevention is stable, so I ran multiple IP and DNS leak tests. Again, Surfshark and PIA are on par:

Surfshark leak test on the US Las Vegas server:

PIA leak test on the US Las Vegas server:

Interestingly, Surfshark doesn’t support the IPv6 protocol due to connection complexities that may arise. PIA takes a different stance and states:

Obfuscation

Both VPNs offer obfuscation in the form of Camouflage Mode for Surfshark and Multi-Hop for PIA.

Camouflage Mode operates automatically when connected to Surfshark’s OpenVPN (UDP or TCP) protocols. In contrast, Multi-Hop on PIA is enabled by switching to OpenVPN (UDP or TCP) and toggling the feature.

Automatic Public WiFi Protection

You can also use Surfshark and PIA for protection against sketchy WiFi networks at restaurants and hotels.

Both VPNs offer WiFi protection by manually connecting to a VPN server. 

Surfshark considers “forgetful” personalities and provides an “Auto-connect feature” on PC and mobile devices that connect you to a VPN when your device finds a WiFi connection.

PIA offers similar automated WiFi protection, although the setup’s more complex and, like the provider says, “experimental.”

Extra Security Features

Surfshark takes security a step further and offers its own Dynamic MultiHop feature, not to be confused with PIA’s obfuscation.

Dynamic MultiHop takes shape in a double VPN, allowing you to connect via two different VPN servers for an extra layer of privacy and encryption.

PIA currently lacks this option.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark and PIA share excellent security features like obfuscation and WiFi protection. But considering Surfshark offers more features, Surfshark wins this round.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Devices & Connections

Surfshark and PIA are economic VPNs that offer unlimited simultaneous connections. Your entire household and office can have a piece of the VPN pie!

These endless connections extend to native Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, Chromebook, and iOS apps.

Surfshark and PIA also cater to SmartTVs, FireTV sticks, and gaming stations. 

If you’re up for it, they also have browser extensions and setups for routers.

Here are some of the routers you can install Surfshark on:

• InvizBox 2 VPN router (Surfshark-ready)
• Synology RT2600AC
• Vilfo
• GLiNet GL-MT300N-V2 Mini Smart Router “Mango”
• Asus RT-AC86U AC2900 Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Gaming Router
• DD-WRT
• OpenWRT
• Tomato

And you can install PIA on these routers:

• ASUS-WRT-Merlin 384.16
• DD-WRT
• LEDE 21.02.3
• ASUS-WRT
• pfSense 2.6.0

Both providers offer router setup guides on their websites.

Smart DNS

PIA offers SmartDNS for Smart TVs, gaming consoles, and other devices that aren’t compatible with apps, but no longer for streaming: PIA now says, “Our Smart DNS feature is no longer compatible with streaming services. It can still be used for general DNS purposes.” PIA extends this service to the US, UK, Germany, Japan, and the Netherlands.

Surfshark ended its SmartDNS service in February 2026. On those devices, you now need Surfshark on a router or shared from a Windows PC’s Wi-Fi hotspot using the OpenVPN protocol. Its native apps cover Android TV, Google TV, Fire TV and Apple TV (tvOS 17 or later).

PIA’s SmartDNS used to unblock these streaming services, which it no longer supports:

• Netflix US
• Hulu
• Amazon Prime US
• Crunchyroll US
• Eurosport
• HBO Max
• YouTube TV US
• Disney+ US
• ITV
• Netflix UK
• BBC iPlayer
• Netflix Japan
• Amazon Prime JP
• Netflix Germany

Here are guides to:

Setup Surfshark on a Smart TV

Setup Surfshark on a gaming console

Setting up Smart DNS using PIA is easy! Simply navigate to the Client Control Panel on the website and select your preferred device from the list.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark supports more routers than PIA; we can’t deny this convenience. PIA took this round because its SmartDNS unblocked more streaming platforms without a router, but PIA now says the feature no longer works with streaming services.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Split Tunneling

Surfshark and PIA support split tunneling. This feature connects only the selected apps to a VPN connection while leaving other apps connected to your local network. 

Surfshark brands the feature as Bypasser, while the PIA VPN keeps things simple with Split Tunnel.

Bypasser’s a little stingy: it splits both apps and websites on Windows, Android, and macOS (except Big Sur), handles only websites on iOS, and isn’t available on Linux. 

On the other hand, PIA’s Split Tunnel covers Windows, Android, macOS, and Linux.

Bypasser:

Split Tunnel:

EXPERT SUMMARY

PIA gets thumbs up for extending full app-based split tunneling to more devices, Linux included.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Dedicated IPs

PIA has offered dedicated IPs for some time, but this feature’s new to Surfshark!

Surfshark now offers dedicated IPs in 16 cities across 13 countries, including the US, the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, and Canada. On the other hand, PIA offers dedicated IP locations in 10 countries, including Australia, Canada, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, Singapore, and the US.

PIA’s dedicated IP costs an extra $5 a month on top of your VPN subscription, according to PIA. 

Surfshark’s is cheaper, with a monthly fee from $3.75.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark now covers more dedicated IP countries, but PIA’s experience and more affordable subscription still give it the upper hand in this department.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Customer Support

Surfshark and PIA don’t leave customers hanging and provide multiple channels for support, including robust 24/7 live chat features that link to customer agents in real time.

On Surfshark, connecting to a rep took less than 20 seconds and less than 30 seconds with PIA! You’ll also appreciate that accessing live chat channels doesn’t require logging into your account.

Alternatively, you can reach Surfshark via email (support@surfshark.com) and an online form. PIA also offers the form, but a support email address is nowhere to be found.

Both VPNs have support centers where you can source information for everyday inquiries. However, Surfshark is the only one to offer handy video tutorials that answer many questions.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Both VPNs have jumped on the 24/7 live chat bandwagon, but Surfshark’s response time is better and offers in-house video tutorials.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Usability

I tested Surfshark and PIA on my Windows and Android devices and found them both beginner-friendly across the interfaces. Depending on your preference, you can also choose between dark and light modes.

Here’s what my Surfshark app looks like on Windows:

Similarly, the PIA app is organized, paying brief attention to detail:

I like how both Android apps are similar to the Windows versions, allowing quick setups for all VPN tasks.

Out of curiosity, I tested to see which VPN connected to a server first. 

Surfshark connected to a server within 4 seconds, but PIA took 8 seconds.

One thing I find convenient with Surfshark is its neatly organized presets on all its apps (Fastest Locations, Nearest Locations, MultiHop, etc.). These help you quickly sift to the type of server you need. PIA requires more scrutinizing to find the perfect server.

A notable difference is the VPN’s kill switches. When I tested it, PIA’s Android app redirected you to Always-ON VPN, which functions like the kill switch, though PIA’s help center now lists a VPN Kill Switch in the app’s Privacy settings.

Surfshark’s neatly organized presets, faster connection time, simple kill switch, and automatic WiFi setup make it easier to use than PIA.

Moving on, all the apps provide “Quick Connect” buttons and icons to connect you to the fastest server automatically. The Windows apps even offer shortcut menus, providing smooth navigation to server options.

EXPERT SUMMARY

Surfshark’s neatly organized presets, faster connection time, simple kill switch, and automatic WiFi setup make it easier to use than PIA.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Price & Value

Surfshark isn’t as affordable as Private Internet Access. PIA’s 2-year deal costs $2.03 a month ($56.84 for 2 years plus 4 months) and renews at the same $56.84 a year, and its 3-year plan is also $2.03 a month ($79 for 39 months). Surfshark’s 2-year plan is $2.49 a month ($67.23 for 27 months) and renews at $79 a year; month to month it is $18.95 against PIA’s $11.95.

A look at the plans confirms this.

Even PIA’s 1-year plan ($3.99 a month, $47.88) is easier to swallow, and renewals stay at the first price, which Surfshark’s don’t.

Regarding payment, both VPNs accept credit/debit cards, PayPal, Apple Pay, Amazon Pay, or cryptocurrency. Surfshark also accepts Google Pay and US ACH payments.

Furthermore, both VPN services offer a 30-day money-back guarantee.

So, if you’re not keen on either service, you can request a cancellation within the first 30 days of subscribing. Surfshark and PIA will then refund your money.

EXPERT SUMMARY

PIA’s prices are hard to beat with affordable subscriptions on top of the benefit of 3 free months when choosing the 3-year plan.

Winner

GET DISCOUNT NOW

Surfshark vs. Private Internet Access (Overview Table)

---

Surfshark costs $2.49 a month on the 2-year plan; our Surfshark price guide compares every plan and renewal, and new customers can try Surfshark free for 7 days on its website before the first charge.

So Who Takes the Limelight?

It was a close call, but Surfshark walks away with a standing ovation.

But that doesn’t mean Private Internet Access is a lowly choice, as it’s excellent if you’re on a budget or an avid torrent seeder.

However, where connection speeds and security are your most significant concerns, choose Surfshark as the top performer. Our Surfshark coupons page then rounds up every Surfshark deal we’ve checked, from student codes to referrals.

Protect private web traffic from snooping, interference, and censorship. All plans are covered by a no-hassle 100% money-back guarantee for your first 30 days of service.

Get the Deal